Исследование Эрика Пелявского - ЗА или ПРОТИВ

А ведь в 4.09 пытались это ... пропихнуть в качестве дефолта...

Нет не это, и дефолт всё равно качался отдельным скин паком, т.е. хочешь ставь, а хочешь нет.

А ещё говорят, что "За рубежом грибных лесов нет."

А вот в детстве(видимо подсознание подсказывало)красил бумажные самолётики почти в те же цвета

Michael_XIII Wrote:

I tired to say - Eric's color shadows not fully correct.
Krofire, you has a very nice yak, but you AMT-12 color has too green shadows that real
Use as reference http://plasticmodel.ru/?page=paints&fact...mel&lang=e

EP "the Administrator" Wrote:

Well, by all means any specific colour interpretation is open to considered debate and discussion. This is of course how the science on these topics progresses. But, this kind of posting is is so utterly pathetic that I just cannot find the words for it....

Mikhail13, IF you --or this model paint company (Akan)-- had ever undertaken any research of any kind, you would have discovered already that the paint on the museum exhibits which you/they hold with such unqualified esteem are not aviation lacquers, let alone are they examples of authentic AMT finish. Their appearance is therefore meaningless in the extreme. Furthermore, had you/they performed any kind of analysis, you would have noticed that the traditional (at least up to 2005) finish on Monino's "La-7" exhibit is (or was) indeed authentic AMT-12, provable by both chemical and spectrographic examination. You might also find the dried up tin of AMT-12 which was used to paint it if you searched around; 15 years ago it was in a box just behind the Sopwith Triplane.

I would be delighted to hear your or their analytical test results on this, or upon any other authentic sample of AMT-12 lacquer. Should you ever perform such research, I would be happy to add these results to my own body of work, supplementing the 20+ samples of this lacquer which I have now. I am quite certain, however, that were you/they ever to examine an authentic specimen of AMT-12 that you would be perfectly satisfied with the general value of the chip which I have suggested.

In the meantime, we would all appreciate it greatly if you would not insult our collective intelligence by declaring the Truth of the Universe to us by virtue of the occasional museum visits of a model paint manufacturer. Quite frankly, you are simply making a complete fool of yourself by so doing, and your tone is unpalatable and condecending. Expressing your opinion is perfectly fine; dictating "reality" to the Forum is not.

Just in closing, I would like to respond to the many dozens of messages and e-mails I have received of late asking why I do not participate more actively on this Forum. I will simply hold up this thread as yet another shining example of why I do not. So long as this type of behaviour is deemed to be acceptable, then my active participation is neither required nor appropriate.

Erik

Вот еще "тихий узас"

Наши в Африке?

Даже просмотрев по диагонали видно, что товарисч снова бредит.

The name 'Pilawskii' in association with paint tends to start alarm bells ringing with me I'm afraid, and as it says 'Kjetil and myself' it must be Mr Pilawskii.

if the name Pilawskii starts ringing alarm bells with you, I would urge you to seek other sources than the forum on a website which has a clear agenda against mr. Pilawskii's findings. And please use some sources whose sources is not solely googling the internet! Let me tell you that Eric has more than 20 years of experience studying VVS and other collurs and he travelled the Soviet Union when it was still the Soviet Union and checked the paint samples on old aircraft and archival material there which are now largely disappeared (i.e. sold!) or unaccessible, respctively, in modern Russia.